Rigged vote-counting is the Holy Grail of collectivism

Rigged vote-counting is the Holy Grail of collectivism

The mantra of collectivism is: “The greater good for the greater number.” The idea is that anything can be justified as proper and moral, even deception, theft, denial of rights, and killing innocent people, if it is claimed that these things are done for the good of society or the nation.

That is the moral code that allows national leaders to lie about anything and commit horrendous crimes against their own countrymen under the excuse of ‘national security’.

This week’s news is loaded with evidence that the outcome of next week’s US election will be determined, not by popular vote, but by rigged vote-counting machines. The technology for this dates back to at least 2002 when I produced the documentary, Invisible Ballots. The technology was crude but functional then. Now it is sophisticated and ready for prime time.

The thing about institutionalized vote fraud that causes many people to think it could never happen is that it requires a large cadre of designers, engineers, manufacturers, and programmers, and it seems unlikely that so many people would conspire to carry out such an irreprehensible task as rigging elections.

In truth, however, most people in the vote-rigging industry endorse the concept of the greater good for the greater number. They see themselves as social engineers entrusted with the grave responsibility of protecting ignorant voters from electing the ‘wrong’ candidate. They see vote rigging as a duty to the nation. They are proud of themselves and their high-minded task.

Whether or not these ‘social engineers’ dare to override the true vote on Monday may depend on how one-sided it is and on how successful alternative media is in bypassing mainstream media. If the margin is huge and the exposure is great, even collectivists may have to sound the retreat.

G. Edward Griffin
2016 November 4